Krauss, D. & Ellsworth, W. (2024). In M. Miller, L.Yelderman, M. Huss, & J. Cantone (Eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 460-475).
Read MorePublications
Filter by:
Scholarship Type
Changing the Public’s Crime Control Theater Attitudes→
/Krauss, D.A., Cook, G.I., Umanath, S., & Song, E. (2022). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(4), 595-615.
Read MoreThe Public’s Perception of Crime Control Theater: It’s Complicated→
/Krauss, D., Cook, G., Song, E., & Umanath, S. (2021). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(3), 316-327.
Read MoreMental State at Time of Offense in the Hot Tub: An Empirical Investigation of Concurrent Evidence in an Insanity Case→
/Krauss, D., Gongola, J., Scurich, N., & Busch, B (2018). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36, 358-372. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2348.
Read MoreThe Effects of Mortality Salience on Death Penalty Decisions When the Defendant Is Mentally Ill→
/Bandt-Law, B. & Krauss, D. (2017). Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research 9, 141-154.
Read MoreVenire Jurors’ Perception of Adversarial Allegiance→
/Scurich, N., Krauss, D., Reiser, L., Garcia, N., & Deer, L. (2015). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 161-168.
Read MoreJuror Sensitivity to Expert Testimony and Delays in Reporting in Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault Cases→
/Schuller, R., Ryan, A., Krauss, D., & Jenkins, G. (2013). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36, 121-128.
Read MoreJust World Beliefs, Expert Psychological Testimony, and Verdicts: A Mediational Model→
/Dover, T., Matthews, M., Krauss, D., & Levin, S. (2012). Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12, 340-363.| DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01278.x
Read MoreThe Admissibility of Expert Testimony in the United States, the Commonwealth, and Elsewhere→
/Krauss, D., Cassar, D., & Strother, A. (2009). In Vol. II Psychological Expertise in Court. (Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. Eds.) A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press. (pp. 1-24).
Read MoreLimited Expertise and Experts: Problems With the Continued Use of Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing→
/Krauss, D., McCabe, J., & McFadden, S. (2009). In Mental Disorder and Criminal Law: Responsibility, Punishment, and Competency (Schopp, R., Wiener, R., Bornstein, B. & Wilborn, S. Eds.). NY: Springer (pp 135-158).
Read MoreGold vs. Platinum: Do Jurors Recognize the Superiority and Limitations of DNA Evidence Compared to Other Types of Forensic Evidence?→
/Lieberman, J., Carrell, C. Miethe, T., & Krauss, D. (2008). Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 14, 27-62.
Read MoreDetermining Dangerousness in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Cognitive-Experiential Self-theory and Juror Judgments of Expert Testimony→
/Lieberman, J., Krauss, D., Kyger, M., & Lehoux, M. (2007). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 507-526.
Read MoreThe Danger of Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing: Exacerbating the Problem of Arbitrary and Capricious Decision-Making→
/Dorland, M., & Krauss, D. (2005). Law and Psychology Review, 29, 63-104.
Read More