Dvoskin, J., Krauss, D., & DeMatteo, D. (2025). American Psychologist, 80(7), 994-996.
Read MorePublications
Filter by:
Scholarship Type
Ethical Considerations for Demands for Evidence in Forensic Settings→
/Fredrick, R., Mikesell, J., Otto, R., Boone, K., Beattey, R., Sweet, J., Krauss, D., & Scroppo, J. (2024). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 55(3),179-196.
Peer reviewed commentary article: Forensic Psychologists Have Biases Too, and Lawyers Also Have Ethical Requirements (Krauss, D.), 189-191
Communication of Risk to Legal Decision-Makers→
/Krauss, D. & Ellsworth, W. (2024). In M. Miller, L.Yelderman, M. Huss, & J. Cantone (Eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 460-475).
Read MoreDecisions Surrounding the Use of Expert Testimony→
/Costanzo, M., Costanzo, S., & Krauss, D. (2024). In M. Miller, L.Yelderman, M. Huss, & J. Cantone (Eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 355-364).
Read MoreRisk Assessment of Child Pornography-Exclusive Offenders→
/Scurich, N. & Krauss, D. (2023). Law and Human Behavior, 47,499-509.
Read MoreForensic Report Writing: Proposing a Research Agenda→
/DeMier, R. & Krauss, D. (2023). In D. DeMatteo & K.C. Scherr (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law. New York: Oxford University Press (pp. 135-147).
Read MoreExpert Psychological Testimony→
/Cutler, B. & Krauss, D. (2023). In D. DeMatteo & K. C. Scherr (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law. New York: Oxford University Press (pp. 56-68).
Read MoreRisk Assessment Communication Difficulties: An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Categorical Versus Probabilistic Risk Communication in Sexually Violent Predator Decisions→
/Krauss, D., Cook, G., & Klapatch, L. (2018). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36, 532-553. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2379
Read MoreMental State at Time of Offense in the Hot Tub: An Empirical Investigation of Concurrent Evidence in an Insanity Case→
/Krauss, D., Gongola, J., Scurich, N., & Busch, B (2018). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36, 358-372. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2348.
Read MoreVenire Jurors’ Perception of Adversarial Allegiance→
/Scurich, N., Krauss, D., Reiser, L., Garcia, N., & Deer, L. (2015). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 161-168.
Read MoreDeterminations of Capacity: Pragmatics, Legal, and Ethical Considerations→
/Wood, S. & Krauss, D. (2015). In Noggle, C. & Dean R. (Eds.). The Neuropsychology of Cortical Dementias. New York: Springer. (pp 135-150).
Read MoreThe Presumption of Dangerousness in Sexual Violent Predator Commitment Hearings→
/Scurich, N. & Krauss, D. (2014). Law, Probability, and Risk, 13, 91-104. DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgt015.
Read MoreJuror Sensitivity to Expert Testimony and Delays in Reporting in Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault Cases→
/Schuller, R., Ryan, A., Krauss, D., & Jenkins, G. (2013). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36, 121-128.
Read MoreContemplating the Presence of Third Party Observers and Facilitators in Psychological Evaluations→
/Otto, R., & Krauss, D. (2009). Assessment, 16, 362-372.
Read MoreThe Effects of Labeling, Expert Testimony and Information Processing Mode on Juror Decisions in a SVP Civil Commitment Trial→
/Lieberman, J. & Krauss, D. (2009). Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6, 25-41.
Read MoreJury Psychology: Social Aspects of the Trial Process. Vol I. Psychology in the Courtroom→
/Lieberman, J. & Krauss, D. Eds. (2009). A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press.
Read MorePsychological Expertise in Court. Vol II. Psychology in the Courtroom→
/Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. Eds. (2009). A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press.
Read MoreThe Admissibility of Expert Testimony in the United States, the Commonwealth, and Elsewhere→
/Krauss, D., Cassar, D., & Strother, A. (2009). In Vol. II Psychological Expertise in Court. (Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. Eds.) A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press. (pp. 1-24).
Read MoreGold vs. Platinum: Do Jurors Recognize the Superiority and Limitations of DNA Evidence Compared to Other Types of Forensic Evidence?→
/Lieberman, J., Carrell, C. Miethe, T., & Krauss, D. (2008). Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 14, 27-62.
Read MoreDetermining Dangerousness in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Cognitive-Experiential Self-theory and Juror Judgments of Expert Testimony→
/Lieberman, J., Krauss, D., Kyger, M., & Lehoux, M. (2007). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 507-526.
Read More