Scurich, N., & Krauss, D. (2013). Jurimetrics Journal, 53, 395-413.
Read MorePublications
Filter by:
Scholarship Type
Risk Assessment in the Law: Legal Admissibility, Scientific Validity, and Some Disparities Between Research and Practice→
/Krauss, D. & Scurich, N. (2013). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31, 215-229. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2065
Read MoreJuror Sensitivity to Expert Testimony and Delays in Reporting in Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault Cases→
/Schuller, R., Ryan, A., Krauss, D., & Jenkins, G. (2013). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36, 121-128.
Read MoreJust World Beliefs, Expert Psychological Testimony, and Verdicts: A Mediational Model→
/Dover, T., Matthews, M., Krauss, D., & Levin, S. (2012). Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12, 340-363.| DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01278.x
Read MoreDangerously Misunderstood: Representative Jurors’ Reactions to Expert Testimony on Future Dangerousness in a Sexually Violent Predator Trial→
/Krauss, D., McCabe, J., & Lieberman, J. (2012). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 18-49. doi: 10.1037/a0024550
Read MoreDifferences Between College Student and More Representative Jurors→
/Wiener, R., Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. (Eds.) (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 325-479.
Read MorePreface to “Differences Between College Student and More Representative Jurors”→
/Lieberman, J., Krauss, D., & Wiener, R. (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 325-327.
Read MoreThe Effect of Acknowledging Mock Jurors’ Feelings on Affective and Cognitive Biases: It Depends on the Sample→
/McCabe, J. & Krauss, D. (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 331-357.
Read MoreMock Jury Research: Where Do We Go From Here?→
/Wiener, R., Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 467-479.
Read MoreReality Check: A Comparison of College Students and Community Samples of Mock Jurors in a Simulated Sexual Violent Predator Civil Commitment→
/McCabe, J., Krauss, D. & Lieberman, J. (2010). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 730-750.
Read MoreContemplating the Presence of Third Party Observers and Facilitators in Psychological Evaluations→
/Otto, R., & Krauss, D. (2009). Assessment, 16, 362-372.
Read MoreEducational and Training Models in Forensic Psychology→
/DeMatteo, D., Marczyk, G., Krauss, D., & Burl, J. (2009). Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 184-191.
Read MoreThe Effects of Labeling, Expert Testimony and Information Processing Mode on Juror Decisions in a SVP Civil Commitment Trial→
/Lieberman, J. & Krauss, D. (2009). Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6, 25-41.
Read MoreGold vs. Platinum: Do Jurors Recognize the Superiority and Limitations of DNA Evidence Compared to Other Types of Forensic Evidence?→
/Lieberman, J., Carrell, C. Miethe, T., & Krauss, D. (2008). Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 14, 27-62.
Read MoreDetermining Dangerousness in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Cognitive-Experiential Self-theory and Juror Judgments of Expert Testimony→
/Lieberman, J., Krauss, D., Kyger, M., & Lehoux, M. (2007). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 507-526.
Read MoreEvaluating Science Outside the Trial Box: Applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ Criminal History Score→
/Krauss, D. (2006). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 289-305.
Read MoreStrategies for Private Practitioners Coping With Subpoenas or Compelled Testimony for Client Records or Test Data→
/Committee On Legal Issues (APA committee) with the following contributors: Abeles, N., Ally, G., Behnke, S., Ernesto, M., Foote, W.,Ramos-Grenier, J. Grossman, J., Hinnefeld, B., Krauss, D., Nessman, A., Puente, A., Zelig, M. (2006). Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 2, 215-222.
Read MoreThe Effects of Judicial Admonitions on Hearsay Evidence→
/Lee, D., Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. (2005). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 589-603.
Read MoreThe Danger of Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing: Exacerbating the Problem of Arbitrary and Capricious Decision-Making→
/Dorland, M., & Krauss, D. (2005). Law and Psychology Review, 29, 63-104.
Read MoreThe Effects of Rational and Experiential Information Processing of Expert Testimony in Death Penalty Cases→
/Krauss, D., Lieberman, J., & Olson, J. (2004). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6, 801-822.
Read More