Lieberman, J., Krauss, D., & Wiener, R. (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 325-327.
Read MorePublications
Filter by:
Scholarship Type
The Effect of Acknowledging Mock Jurors’ Feelings on Affective and Cognitive Biases: It Depends on the Sample→
/McCabe, J. & Krauss, D. (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 331-357.
Read MoreMock Jury Research: Where Do We Go From Here?→
/Wiener, R., Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. (2011). A special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 467-479.
Read MoreReality Check: A Comparison of College Students and Community Samples of Mock Jurors in a Simulated Sexual Violent Predator Civil Commitment→
/McCabe, J., Krauss, D. & Lieberman, J. (2010). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 730-750.
Read MoreContemplating the Presence of Third Party Observers and Facilitators in Psychological Evaluations→
/Otto, R., & Krauss, D. (2009). Assessment, 16, 362-372.
Read MoreEducational and Training Models in Forensic Psychology→
/DeMatteo, D., Marczyk, G., Krauss, D., & Burl, J. (2009). Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 184-191.
Read MoreThe Effects of Labeling, Expert Testimony and Information Processing Mode on Juror Decisions in a SVP Civil Commitment Trial→
/Lieberman, J. & Krauss, D. (2009). Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6, 25-41.
Read MoreJury Psychology: Social Aspects of the Trial Process. Vol I. Psychology in the Courtroom→
/Lieberman, J. & Krauss, D. Eds. (2009). A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press.
Read MorePsychological Expertise in Court. Vol II. Psychology in the Courtroom→
/Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. Eds. (2009). A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press.
Read MoreThe Admissibility of Expert Testimony in the United States, the Commonwealth, and Elsewhere→
/Krauss, D., Cassar, D., & Strother, A. (2009). In Vol. II Psychological Expertise in Court. (Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. Eds.) A two volume edited work in the Series: Psychology, Crime, & Law (D. Canter Ed.). Ashgate Press. (pp. 1-24).
Read MoreLimited Expertise and Experts: Problems With the Continued Use of Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing→
/Krauss, D., McCabe, J., & McFadden, S. (2009). In Mental Disorder and Criminal Law: Responsibility, Punishment, and Competency (Schopp, R., Wiener, R., Bornstein, B. & Wilborn, S. Eds.). NY: Springer (pp 135-158).
Read MoreGold vs. Platinum: Do Jurors Recognize the Superiority and Limitations of DNA Evidence Compared to Other Types of Forensic Evidence?→
/Lieberman, J., Carrell, C. Miethe, T., & Krauss, D. (2008). Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 14, 27-62.
Read MoreDetermining Dangerousness in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Cognitive-Experiential Self-theory and Juror Judgments of Expert Testimony→
/Lieberman, J., Krauss, D., Kyger, M., & Lehoux, M. (2007). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 507-526.
Read MoreThe Role of Forensic Mental Experts in Federal Sentencing Proceedings→
/Krauss, D. & Goldstein, A. (2007). In Forensic Psychology: Emerging Topics and Expanding Roles (Goldstein, A. Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. (pp 359-385).
Read MoreExpert Testimony for the Courts→
/Costanzo, M., Krauss, D., & Pezdek, K. (2007). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Read MoreExpert Testimony on Risk and Future Dangerousness→
/Krauss, D. & Lieberman, J. (2007). In Expert Testimony for the Courts (Costanzo, M., Krauss, D., & Pezdek, K. Eds). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (pp 227-250).
Read MoreVarieties and Vagaries of Expert Psychological Testimony→
/Costanzo, M., Krauss, D., & Pezdek, K. (2007). In Expert Testimony for the Courts (Costanzo, M., Krauss, D., & Pezdek, K. Eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp 1-8).
Read MoreEvaluating Science Outside the Trial Box: Applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ Criminal History Score→
/Krauss, D. (2006). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 289-305.
Read MoreStrategies for Private Practitioners Coping With Subpoenas or Compelled Testimony for Client Records or Test Data→
/Committee On Legal Issues (APA committee) with the following contributors: Abeles, N., Ally, G., Behnke, S., Ernesto, M., Foote, W.,Ramos-Grenier, J. Grossman, J., Hinnefeld, B., Krauss, D., Nessman, A., Puente, A., Zelig, M. (2006). Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 2, 215-222.
Read MoreTraining in Forensic Psychology: Training for What Goal?→
/Krauss, D. & Sales, B. (2006). In I. Weiner & A. Hess (Eds.) Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 3rd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. (pp 851-871).
Read More